Geopolitics of Possibility: Emerging Technologies Can Rewire Power for Middle Economies

Power Is Being Rewritten, Quietly

For decades, global power followed a predictable pattern. A small number of superpowers set the rules. Everyone else adapted. Technology reinforced this hierarchy by flowing outward from a handful of centres: Silicon Valley, Washington, Beijing, Brussels.

That world is dissolving.

Today, emerging technologies are no longer neutral tools of productivity. They are reshaping how power is exercised, negotiated, and distributed. Compute capacity, data flows, energy infrastructure, and trust frameworks are becoming as strategically important as trade routes and natural resources.

As we mark Black History Month, this moment carries a deeper resonance. History shows us that progress is rarely granted; it is constructed through agency, intention, and control over systems. The same principle now applies to nations navigating the next technological era.

This edition explores how middle economies can move beyond reaction, and use technology as a deliberate geopolitical multiplier.

Emerging technologies, powered not only by artificial intelligence but also by advanced materials, energy storage, data infrastructure, and satellite services are not merely catalysts of economic growth.

They are drivers of strategic agency and competitive advantage.

In this context, technology is not a product to adopt but a terrain to govern. The policy choices nations make today about compute access, industrial strategy, rule-making, and trust frameworks, will determine who wins tomorrow.

Middle economies can move from spectators to architects of the next geopolitical order.

What To Expect In Todays Edition:

• Celebrating Black History Month
• The Reality of AI Geopolitics
• China’s framing of AI as an epoch-making national capability and why it matters
• How national AI laws are becoming tools of competitive advantage
• Why governance and trust frameworks are now economic leverage
• A practical playbook for middle economies moving from dependency to authorship

BLACK HISTORY MONTH
Honouring Legacy. Designing the Future.

Black History Month is not just about remembering the past; it’s about recognizing the architects of the future. Progress happens when innovation is rooted in purpose, equity, and people.

Black history is rich with builders, engineers, policymakers, entrepreneurs, and educators who designed systems under pressure, led with resilience, and created opportunity where none existed. Their legacy isn’t only in what they overcame, but in what they designed for the future: smarter cities, fairer institutions, stronger communities.

As countries work at the intersection of technology, leadership, and transformation, Black History Month is a reminder that:

• Innovation is most powerful when it includes diverse lived experiences
• Leadership means designing systems that work for everyone, not just a few
• The future we build should expand access, dignity, and possibility

This month, and every month, we honor the past by building responsibly, leading boldly, and creating space for the next generation of thinkers and operators.

Because history didn’t end with those who came before us. It continues with what we choose to build next.

THE REALITY OF AI GEOPOLITICS
AI Geopolitics Isn’t Just A Metaphor; It’s Real

AI is no longer a corporate innovation race. It is fully immersed in its geopolitical phase.

For much of the last decade, AI was framed as a competitive advantage for companies. Today, it is treated by governments as strategic infrastructure. Intelligence capability now intersects directly with national security, economic resilience, and global influence.

This shift changes the central question. It is no longer “who builds the best models?” but “who controls the systems that allow intelligence to be developed, deployed, and trusted at scale?

At the World Economic Forum in Davos in late January 2026, policymakers and economists repeatedly framed AI alongside energy security, supply chains, and defence readiness. Commentary from Davos highlighted how alliances are increasingly shaped around technology stacks rather than ideology alone (Forbes, 26 January 2026).

When AI becomes infrastructure, it must be governed like infrastructure. Middle economies that continue to treat AI as a procurement decision rather than a strategic asset risk locking themselves into dependency, consuming intelligence without shaping its rules.

This isn’t abstract. It reflects a very real shift: countries are treating intelligence capability not just as innovation, but as sovereignty.

EPOCH-MAKNG STRATEGY
China’s Strategic Narrative: AI as Epoch-Making National Capacity 

Compute is emerging as a determinant of sovereign power. This matters geopolitically: when major powers explicitly link national development plans to frontier technologies, they signal strategic intent to both partners and competitors.

AI is often discussed as if it lives in the cloud. In reality, it is grounded in physical systems: semiconductors, data centers, energy grids, and cooling capacity. Control over these inputs determines the pace and direction of AI progress.

As a result, chips have become leverage, and access to compute has become a strategic constraint.

In late January 2026, Chinese leadership publicly framed AI, quantum computing, and advanced digital systems as “epoch-making technologies,” placing them on par with the Industrial Revolution and early electrification (Tom’s Hardware, 26 January 2026). At the same time, multiple governments reaffirmed export controls and domestic capacity-building as matters of national security rather than trade policy.

For middle economies, this reality is stark. Without secure access to compute and energy, AI ambitions remain symbolic. Sovereignty in the AI age is not about isolation, but about ensuring that access to intelligence is reliable, governed, and aligned with national priorities.

AI LAWS AND GOVERNANCE
National AI Laws and Competitive Governance

AI regulation has become a tool of economic positioning. To think geopolitically about “AI” without integrating related technologies is to miss the forest for the trees

The global regulatory landscape is fragmenting. Rather than converging on a single model, regions are developing distinct approaches to AI governance, each reflecting different priorities around risk, innovation, and state oversight.

These frameworks increasingly determine which systems can cross borders, which companies can scale globally, and which nations are trusted partners.

Advanced materials that underpin next-generation hardware. Energy storage and grid resilience for sustained compute capacity. Space and satellite systems that enable secure data flows and connectivity.

By early February 2026, multiple countries had advanced national AI laws focused on risk-based oversight, data protection, and accountability for high-impact systems (Global AI Landscape Briefings, 1 February 2026). International coordination continues through summit processes, even as competitive tensions remain unresolved.

For middle economies, governance is not a constraint; it is leverage. Clear, credible regulatory frameworks signal trust, attract investment, and enable participation in global markets. In the next economic order, trust will travel faster than speed, rather than remain siloed.

BEYOND AI
A Broader Technology Ecosystem Approach 

AI, by itself, does not deliver sovereignty.

Many countries are racing to deploy AI tools without investing equally in the foundations that make them strategic. Without resilient energy systems, semiconductor design capacity, digital public infrastructure, and trusted data governance, AI adoption creates dependence rather than advantage.

This is the quiet risk facing many middle economies.
Policy analyses released in late January and early February 2026 repeatedly warned that countries focusing solely on AI applications, without infrastructure and governance risk becoming perpetual consumers of foreign platforms and models (Regional Technology Policy Roundups, 1 February 2026).

The path forward for middle economies:

1. Identify leverage frameworks technologies aligned with national priorities.

2. Build governance frameworks that balance innovation with trust.

3. Invest in infrastructure sovereignty.

4. Develop talent ecosystems that thrive locally and contribute globally.

Economic sovereignty in the digital age requires system-level thinking. Ownership matters. Governance matters. And alignment between technology and public interest matters most of all. This approach turns strategic vulnerability into competitive flexibility.

AI ADOPTION
From Dependency to Sovereignty: A Playbook For Middle Economies

Copying Silicon Valley is not a strategy.

Innovation models that succeed in one context often fail in another. Middle economies that thrive are those that localise technology to national priorities, food security, climate-resilient infrastructure, public service delivery, and exportable GovTech systems.

Relevance, not replication, creates durable advantage.

Recent national strategies across Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia show a growing emphasis on digital public infrastructure, climate-aligned technology, and sector-specific innovation rather than general-purpose hype (Policy Strategy Reviews, January–February 2026).

Middle powers do not need to dominate every technological frontier. They need to choose where technology amplifies their unique strengths, and commit deeply there.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
We value your feedback!

Your thoughts and opinions help us improve our newsletter. Please take a moment to let us know what you think.