From Innovation to Influence - AI Has Entered Its Geopolitical Phase: Strategic Compute Power, Economic Sovereignty and the New Global Order

Welcome to The Digital Bridge's first newsletter of the year. If 2025 was the year AI became inescapably central to business innovation and operational transformation, 2026 is the year it became a matter of statecraft. Across continents leaders are thinking about intelligence not just in terms of productivity but as a geopolitical asset that shapes national strength economic opportunity and global influence. The past year has confirmed that AI is no longer simply a tool for efficiency. It is a geopolitical asset shaping trade, security, national influence, and the distribution of economic power. Nations and regions across Africa, Europe, and Asia are racing to secure compute capacity, regulate deployment, and position themselves in this new intelligence-driven global order.

In this edition we explore why AI is no longer just a tech trend but a structural factor in the global balance of power; why compute capacity is now strategic infrastructure; how regulation doubles as economic positioning; and what this means for emerging economies and new forms of cooperation.

It sets the stage for understanding AI as infrastructure and strategic leverage. Drawing on recent reporting from Control Risks on compute as a national asset, inAfrika’s analysis of African data centre expansion, and Eurasia Review on middle powers shaping AI governance, we see a clear pattern: whoever controls the infrastructure, the rules, and the talent will shape who wins in the next economic order.


This week’s edition covers:

• How compute capacity is becoming a determinant of national power, with references to the 2025 Control Risks report on AI and statecraft.

• The rise of sovereign AI infrastructure in Africa and Asia as noted by inAfrika and LinkedIn industry insights.

• How regulation and policy are emerging as competitive levers for economic positioning, drawing on Eurasia Review and recent BRICS discussions.

• The intersection of AI and energy infrastructure, based on reports from IT Online on data centre power demands and sustainability.

• The role of emerging economies in defining inclusive AI governance models, referencing the Digital Ethiopia 2030 strategy and BRICS AI declarations.

• Why leadership in 2026 requires governance literacy, strategic foresight, and the ability to align AI deployment with national and societal objectives.

SOVEREIGN STRATEGY
AI as a Pillar of Sovereign Strategy

AI has graduated from pilots and isolated deployments to the core of national competitiveness. Governments across Africa, Europe, and Asia are investing in domestic computing power, chip fabrication, and sovereign cloud ecosystems to anchor talent, industry, and economic influence. Kenya’s geothermal-powered data centers and Morocco’s regional AI hubs illustrate a broader trend: governments are no longer spectators, they are constructing the digital backbone that will determine strategic advantage for the decade ahead, as highlighted by inAfrika’s reporting on African AI infrastructure.

Compute has become the new currency of power. Control of high-performance GPUs, resilient data centerss, and frontier model environments dictates which nations can lead in AI-driven innovation and which will remain dependent. Without these resources, countries face vulnerabilities that extend beyond technological gaps to economic leverage and global influence. Recent analysis from Control Risks shows that nations without secure AI infrastructure are entering a new form of dependence, where even access to basic digital services may be mediated by others.

Across Asia, countries are accelerating domestic chip fabrication, cloud sovereignty, and data localisation. Reports from Eurasia Review note that regional hubs in India, Japan, and South Korea are becoming focal points of AI deployment, with direct implications for regional influence and global supply chains. For policymakers, the message is clear: strategic infrastructure is inseparable from economic and diplomatic power.

STRATEGIC LEVERAGE
Regulation as Strategic Leverage

Policy has become a core instrument of national advantage.

Governments are defining where AI can operate, how data flows, and which companies can scale internationally.

The Indian AI Impact Summit and BRICS AI declarations underscore a shift toward frameworks that combine national sovereignty with international cooperation. Eurasia Review emphasizes that regulation now serves as a competitive tool: trust frameworks, compliance standards, and licensing rules are shaping who can participate in global AI markets.

Regulation is no longer about slowing innovation: it is about channeling it responsibly. Nations that integrate governance early into AI deployment gain a first-mover advantage, while those that react later risk regulatory friction, restricted market access, and reputational challenges.

This is particularly evident in emerging markets, where regulatory clarity is enabling faster adoption while protecting citizens, as highlighted in Control Risks and BRICS reporting.

AI INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABLE POWER
Energy, Sustainability and Compute

AI infrastructure is energy intensive, requiring stable and sustainable power. Data centres that integrate clean energy gain dual advantage: supporting environmental goals while securing reliable high-performance computing.

IT Online reports that in 2025, energy-consumption challenges have become a central factor in national AI strategy, particularly as AI workloads grow exponentially.

Countries investing in renewable-powered compute infrastructure are not only reducing environmental risk, they are creating strategic resilience. For example, geothermal-powered facilities in East Africa and solar-powered data centers in the Middle East are providing nations with autonomy over AI operations and industrial innovation.

These developments show that energy policy and AI strategy are now inseparable, and countries that fail to secure this nexus risk falling behind in both technology and economic competitiveness.

REDRAWING THE MAP
Emerging Economies Redrawing The Map

AI geopolitics is no longer defined solely by traditional powers. Middle powers and emerging economies are asserting influence through pragmatic adoption, capacity building, and governance innovation. Ethiopia’s Digital Ethiopia 2030 strategy shows how AI can strengthen citizen trust, industrial capacity, and inclusive growth. BRICS nations are actively shaping global principles for responsible AI, reflecting a multipolar governance landscape.

Across Africa, inAfrika reporting highlights how regional hubs are combining infrastructure, education, and regulation to create AI ecosystems that are both competitive and inclusive.

These examples demonstrate that influence is no longer the preserve of historically dominant economies: emerging powers are defining models of AI deployment aligned with societal progress and strategic advantage.

ETHICAL GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP
Leadership 2026

The defining question for 2026 is not whether AI will matter: it is who governs it, how, and to what ends. Leadership now demands fluency in infrastructure, regulatory strategy, and talent development. Policymakers and executives must anticipate risks, understand societal impact, and align AI deployment with national and global priorities.

Organizations and governments that succeed will integrate AI as a strategic asset while fostering transparency, trust, and inclusion. Control Risks and Eurasia Review reporting show that leaders who fail to understand the geopolitical stakes of AI risk losing influence before 2030.

2026 will reward those who treat AI not merely as a technology, but as a lever of power, a tool of economic resilience, and a catalyst for societal progress.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
We value your feedback!

Your thoughts and opinions help us improve our newsletter. Please take a moment to let us know what you think.